Council of Chalcedon on Election & predestination
No position located on this map
Searched in the sources read for this figure and not found. A limit of the reading rather than a claim about the figure — a source not yet read could settle it.
This one and the same Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son [of God] must be confessed to be in two natures, unconfusedly, immutably, indivisibly, inseparably [united]
THE POSITION
Nothing in the Definition touches the basis on which God chooses the saved. Chalcedon exists to settle how the two natures are united in one person, and it does that and stops. The category was available in 451 — Augustine had been dead twenty-one years and the semi-Pelagian dispute was still running in Gaul — so this is a council declining a question, not a council that never met it.
WHAT OTHERS HOLD HERE
ABOUT THIS FIGURE
Defined one person in two natures — unconfusedly, immutably, indivisibly, inseparably — against Eutyches. Received Leo's Tome and issued 30 canons.
Cite this page
"Council of Chalcedon on Election & predestination", Examined Doctrine, July 2026 edition, https://examineddoctrine.com/position/chalcedon-451/election (archived at https://examineddoctrine.com/editions/2026-07/position/chalcedon-451/election).