Skip to content
Examined Doctrine

Charles Grandison Finney on Election & predestination

1792 – 1875 · NEW SCHOOL REVIVALIST / OBERLIN
READ IN A PRIMARY SOURCELEANS TOWARD
STANCE

Conditional — grounded in foreseen faith

God did not elect them to salvation, for or on account of their foreseen good works, but upon condition of their foreseen repentance, faith and perseverance.
Lectures on Systematic Theology (1878 ed.), Lecture XLIII (Election), II.3 ↗

THE POSITION

Everyone who will be saved was chosen from eternity to salvation "through the sanctification of their hearts by faith in Christ," with the means elected as really as the end. The election is not for foreseen good works but on condition of foreseen repentance, faith and perseverance. The stance's word "grounded" goes further than he does, though. The foreseen fact "must have been a condition in the sense of a sine qua non, of their election to salvation, but could not have been the fundamental reason for it." The reason he gives is the highest good of the universe: the best system of means for that end "included the election of just those who were elected, and no others." Conditioned on foreseen faith but not grounded in it, so the state is a lean.

SCRIPTURE
EPHESIANS 1:4 · BSB

4 For He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless in His presence. In love

4 OTHERS HOLD THIS

Jacobus ArminiusChrysostomPhilip MelanchthonWesley
Unconditional — grounded in God's free choiceAQUINAS · AUGUSTINE · VODDIE BAUCHAM · CALVIN · JONATHAN EDWARDS · TIM KELLER · SECOND LONDON BAPTIST CONFESSION · LUTHER · JOHN MACARTHUR · GAVIN ORTLUND · JOHN OWEN · JUSTIN PETERS · JOHN PIPER · JOHN DUNS SCOTUS · R.C. SPROUL · CHARLES HADDON SPURGEON · WESTMINSTER CONFESSION · GEORGE WHITEFIELD · ZWINGLI
Affirmed, held alongside real human responsibility, treated as non-dividingBILLY GRAHAM · JOSH HOWERTON
See all 36 figures on election & predestination →

ABOUT THIS FIGURE

Law student turned revivalist of the Second Great Awakening, licensed and ordained by a Presbyterian presbytery in 1824, later professor of theology and president at Oberlin College. His Lectures on Revivals of Religion argued that a revival is the right use of means and not a miracle. His Systematic Theology built a doctrine of salvation on moral government and on the sinner's natural ability, and denied original sin as a sinful nature, imputed righteousness, and that the atonement paid what sinners owed. This entry rests on that Systematic Theology (1878 edition), the Revival Lectures, one chapter of the Memoirs, three Oberlin Evangelist pieces and one letter.

12 OF 15 POSITIONS QUOTED
Everything Charles Grandison Finney holds →
Cite this page

"Charles Grandison Finney on Election & predestination", Examined Doctrine, July 2026 edition, https://examineddoctrine.com/position/finney/election (archived at https://examineddoctrine.com/editions/2026-07/position/finney/election).

How citation works here