Skip to content
Examined Doctrine

John Duns Scotus on Canon of the Old Testament

C. 1266 – 1308 · SCHOLASTIC
NOT LOCATED IN A SOURCENO POSITION FOUND°
NO STANCE — AND WHY

No position located on this map

Searched in the sources read for this figure and not found. A limit of the reading rather than a claim about the figure — a source not yet read could settle it.

THE POSITION

Not located in this pass. The medieval West used the wider canon in practice while Jerome's distinction between canonical and ecclesiastical books stayed in circulation, so the honest answer needs a text of his rather than an assumption from period practice.

WHY THERE IS NO QUOTATIONNo quotations. Scotus died in 1308 and the Latin is public domain, but the usable English translations are modern and in copyright, so these positions are paraphrased from standard scholarly accounts rather than reproduced.

WHAT OTHERS HOLD HERE

66 books — Apocrypha useful but not ScriptureATHANASIUS · CALVIN · JONATHAN EDWARDS · THE CHURCH OF ELEVEN22 STATEMENT OF FAITH · JOSH HOWERTON · SECOND LONDON BAPTIST CONFESSION · LUTHER · JOHN MACARTHUR · GAVIN ORTLUND · JOHN OWEN · JUSTIN PETERS · R.C. SPROUL · WESTMINSTER CONFESSION · ZWINGLI
Wider canon — deuterocanonical books includedAQUINAS · AUGUSTINE
Predates or straddles the settled disputeCHRYSOSTOM · IRENAEUS
See all 24 figures on canon of the old testament →

ABOUT THIS FIGURE

Franciscan, the Subtle Doctor. Argued for the univocity of being and for a will free in its own right rather than moved by the intellect's judgment — the point where the Franciscan schools part from Aquinas.

READ ACROSS 18 LOCI, NONE QUOTED
Everything John Duns Scotus holds →
Cite this page

"John Duns Scotus on Canon of the Old Testament", Examined Doctrine, July 2026 edition, https://examineddoctrine.com/position/scotus/ot-canon (archived at https://examineddoctrine.com/editions/2026-07/position/scotus/ot-canon).

How citation works here