Skip to content
Examined Doctrine
PASSAGE · BSB

Romans 9

16 positions in the corpus lean on this chapter. Cited verses are marked.

1I speak the truth in Christ; I am not lying, as confirmed by my conscience in the Holy Spirit.

2I have deep sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart.

3For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my own flesh and blood,

4the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory and the covenants; theirs the giving of the law, the temple worship, and the promises.

5Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them proceeds the human descent of Christ, who is God over all, forever worthy of praise! Amen.

6It is not as though God’s word has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.

7Nor because they are Abraham’s descendants are they all his children. On the contrary, “Through Isaac your offspring will be reckoned.”

8So it is not the children of the flesh who are God’s children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as offspring.

9For this is what the promise stated: “At the appointed time I will return, and Sarah will have a son.”

10Not only that, but Rebecca’s children were conceived by one man, our father Isaac.

11Yet before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad, in order that God’s plan of election might stand,

12not by works but by Him who calls, she was told, “The older will serve the younger.”

13So it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”

14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Certainly not!

15For He says to Moses: “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”

16So then, it does not depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy.

17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”

18Therefore God has mercy on whom He wants to have mercy, and He hardens whom He wants to harden.

19One of you will say to me, “Then why does God still find fault? For who can resist His will?”

20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to Him who formed it, “Why did You make me like this?”

21Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?

22What if God, intending to show His wrath and make His power known, bore with great patience the vessels of His wrath, prepared for destruction?

23What if He did this to make the riches of His glory known to the vessels of His mercy, whom He prepared in advance for glory—

24including us, whom He has called not only from the Jews, but also from the Gentiles?

25As He says in Hosea: “I will call them ‘My People’ who are not My people, and I will call her ‘My Beloved’ who is not My beloved,”

26and, “It will happen that in the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ they will be called ‘sons of the living God.’”

27Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: “Though the number of the Israelites is like the sand of the sea, only the remnant will be saved.

28For the Lord will carry out His sentence on the earth thoroughly and decisively.”

29It is just as Isaiah foretold: “Unless the Lord of Hosts had left us descendants, we would have become like Sodom, we would have resembled Gomorrah.”

30What then will we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith;

31but Israel, who pursued a law of righteousness, has not attained it.

32Why not? Because their pursuit was not by faith, but as if it were by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone,

33as it is written: “See, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense; and the one who believes in Him will never be put to shame.”

Who leans on it

Augustine on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Election is unconditional, grounded in God's free mercy and not in foreseen merit or faith. Augustine names and repudiates his own earlier position: in an earlier work he had held that God elects based on foreseen faith,…Calvin on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Election rests on God's free choice and nothing in the person chosen: the decree is 'founded on his free mercy, without any respect to human worth' (Institutes III.xxi.7). Calvin explicitly refuses to make foreknowledge …Chrysostom on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°He reads Romans 9 through foreknowledge from end to end. Jacob was chosen before birth because God, unlike men, does not wait on the outcome of a life to see what a soul is: He "knoweth which is the wicked and which not …Chrysostom on extent of the atonementDISPUTED READINGCONTESTED°He never poses the question of extent. What he does say, working out why some Jews were saved and others not, puts the whole failure on the receiving side and none of it on the provision: all were called, and so far as G…Jonathan Edwards on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Election rests on God's sovereign good pleasure, not on anything foreseen in the creature — "love, not for any excellency, but merely God's good pleasure." He adds a causal argument: a decree grounded in foresight would …M. Heiser on election & predestinationDISPUTED READINGNO FIT°Affirms individual election unto salvation and predestination as real, while denying that foreknowledge entails predestination — God foreknows all actual and all possible futures, and 1 Samuel 23 shows him foreknowing th…Second London Baptist Confession on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Chapter 3.5 grounds election in God's eternal purpose and the good pleasure of his will, with nothing in the creature moving him to it. Paragraph 3.2 rules out the alternative explicitly: God has not decreed anything bec…Second London Baptist Confession on the final state of the lostPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Chapter 32.2 sends the wicked into eternal torments and everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, set in deliberate parallel with the eternal life of the righteous. Chapter 31.1 has the intermediate state as…Luther on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°The ground of election is God's own immutable will and nothing in the creature. Luther makes the point as a claim about God's nature rather than about a decree: because God's knowledge and will are eternal and cannot be …John MacArthur on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Unconditional, grounded solely in God's sovereign will — explicitly not in foreseen faith or anticipated human response. Paired directly with an affirmation that election doesn't remove human responsibility to repent and…Philip Melanchthon on original sin & the human willDISPUTED READINGCONTESTEDMelanchthon changed his mind, publicly, and the corpus records the change rather than a settled view. The 1521 Loci denies free will outright on determinist grounds. The Augsburg Confession of 1530 holds a middle line — …Philip Melanchthon on election & predestinationDISPUTED READINGCONTESTEDThe same reversal, worked out on the doctrine of election. In 1521 predestination is the reason there is no free will at all. By 1532 he was writing that there is 'some cause in the recipient, in so far as he does not re…John Owen on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Unconditional, and stated in the negative as well as the positive: God chooses whom he pleases out of the whole of mankind, and nothing in the chosen moves him to it. Owen's catechism puts the elect and the reprobate in …John Piper on election & predestinationSTANDARD ACCOUNTAFFIRMS°Unconditional election; five-point Reformed soteriology.Westminster Confession on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°WCF 3.5 rules out foreseen faith by name, and then rules out every substitute for it - foreseen works, foreseen perseverance, 'or any other thing in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving Him thereunto.' WCF 3.2 h…Zwingli on election & predestinationPRIMARY SOURCEAFFIRMS°Unconditional, and stated in the sharpest possible order: election does not follow faith, faith follows election. Zwingli uses this to argue that infants who die may be elect even though they never believed, and that Mar…