Skip to content
Examined Doctrine

Philip Melanchthon on Extent of the atonement

1497 – 1560 · LUTHERAN
DISPUTED AMONG SCHOLARSINTERNALLY CONTESTED
STANCE

Universal — for all, applied on faith

the promise of the remission of sins and of justification has been given us for Christ's sake, who was given for us in order that He might make satisfaction for the sins of the world, and has been appointed as the [only] Mediator and Propitiator.
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Art. IV (Triglot trans.), the paragraph beginning 'Because, therefore, men by their own strength cannot fulfil the Law of God' ↗

THE POSITION

The definite-versus-universal question is a post-Dort argument and Melanchthon never answers it in those terms. What he does say points one way: Christ was given to make satisfaction for the sins of the world, and the mature Melanchthon makes the universality of the promise load-bearing — it is the premise from which he argues that the difference between the saved and the lost must lie in the human response.

SCRIPTURE
1 TIMOTHY 2:5 · BSB

5 For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,

5 OTHERS HOLD THIS

Jacobus ArminiusAthanasiusChrysostomLutherWesley
Definite — for the elect, effectuallyVODDIE BAUCHAM · JONATHAN EDWARDS · SECOND LONDON BAPTIST CONFESSION · JOHN MACARTHUR · JOHN OWEN · JOHN PIPER · R.C. SPROUL · WESTMINSTER CONFESSION
Sufficient for all, efficient for the electAQUINAS · CALVIN · CHARLES HADDON SPURGEON
Never framed in these termsAUGUSTINE · JOSH HOWERTON · NICAEA I · ZWINGLI
See all 24 figures on extent of the atonement →

ABOUT THIS FIGURE

Luther's colleague at Wittenberg and the Reformation's systematizer. He wrote the first Protestant systematic theology (Loci Communes, 1521), drafted the Augsburg Confession (1530) and its Apology (1531), and then revised his own work far enough that the Formula of Concord condemned the later version seventeen years after his death. This entry rests on the Augsburg Confession read in Latin and English — Part I less Articles VI-VIII and XIV-XVI, plus Part II Articles XXII-XXIV and XXVIII — on the opening articles of the Apology in English, and on the successive editions of the Loci through Latin sentences preserved by Schaff and Bente; no edition of the Loci itself was read.

15 OF 18 POSITIONS QUOTED
Everything Philip Melanchthon holds →
Cite this page

"Philip Melanchthon on Extent of the atonement", Examined Doctrine, July 2026 edition, https://examineddoctrine.com/position/melanchthon/atonement-extent (archived at https://examineddoctrine.com/editions/2026-07/position/melanchthon/atonement-extent).

How citation works here