What did the fall do to us, and can we turn to God on our own?
Nineteen of the 31 figures who answer say the fall left the will unable to turn to God until God frees it. The other twelve split three ways: human nature wounded but not destroyed, everyone given grace to respond, or the will still essentially free. What divides them is how deep the damage goes, and how much is left for the will to do.
The 4 views side by side
| Unable until God frees the willBondage of the will | Wounded, not destroyedLoss of original justice | Unable, but grace given to allPrevenient grace | The will is still free |
|---|---|---|---|
| What did the fall do to people? | |||
Left human nature “utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good,” in the words of Westminster and the 1689 Confession. From Westminster Confession, Second London Baptist Confession | Took away “original justice,” a gift that kept human nature in order. Nature itself is wounded, not destroyed. | Corrupted it through and through; Arminius affirms this too, though he is often misread. Wesley calls it “only evil continually.” From John Wesley, Jacobus Arminius | Passed on death or harm, but not guilt. Chrysostom asks how another man’s disobedience could make anyone a sinner; Finney says what we inherit isn’t sinful in itself. |
| Can the will turn to God on its own? | |||
No. People still make real choices, but none will choose God until God changes the heart. From John Calvin, Westminster Confession, Second London Baptist Confession, Martin Luther, Jonathan Edwards, John Owen, George Whitefield, Justin Peters | Not without grace. But the will keeps real freedom, and grace builds on nature rather than replacing it. From Council of Ephesus, Thomas Aquinas, William of Ockham, Athanasius of Alexandria | Not on its own, but no one is left on their own. God gives everyone a grace that restores the power to say yes or no. From Jacobus Arminius, John Wesley | The will is still free. Finney says it never lost its “natural ability” to obey; Chrysostom says grace comes first but God “draws no one by force.” |
| The main argument | |||
Jesus says no one can come to him unless the Father draws him. Sproul reads “draw” as compel, not invite. From R.C. Sproul, John Calvin, John Owen, Second London Baptist Confession, Westminster Confession | What the fall removed was a gift added to human nature, not nature itself. So grace perfects nature rather than replacing it. | Grace reaches everyone. Wesley: “no man sins because he has not grace, but because he does not use the grace which he hath.” From John Wesley, Jacobus Arminius | Being held responsible assumes being free. Finney says God’s rule over people assumes “the natural ability of men to obey”; Basil says each of us is “the first author of his own vice.” |
| Where they differ among themselves | |||
Whether Adam’s guilt is inherited, or only his corrupted condition. The 1689 Confession, Edwards and MacArthur say guilt too; Zwingli calls it “a disease, not a sin,” and Heiser denies inherited guilt outright. From Second London Baptist Confession, Jonathan Edwards, John MacArthur, Huldrych Zwingli, Michael S. Heiser | How deep the wound goes. Scotus treats it more lightly than Aquinas, leaving the will freer; Athanasius sees the fall mainly as a slide into decay and death. From John Duns Scotus, Thomas Aquinas, Athanasius of Alexandria | Little between Arminius and Wesley. Melanchthon changed his mind: in 1521 he denied free will outright, and later taught that the will, drawn by the Spirit, can assent or resist. | How they tell the story. Irenaeus pictures the first people as infants who had to grow, not perfect beings who fell; the Basil texts read here never treat Adam’s fall at all. |
| Key passage | |||
| John 6:44 | Romans 5:12 | Titus 2:11 | Matthew 23:37 |
| In their own words | |||
“When the will is enchained as the slave of sin, it cannot make a movement towards goodness, far less steadily pursue it.” | “she is after all made with power over herself” | “Here three causes of a good action concur: the Word of God, the Holy Spirit, and the human will assenting to and not resisting the Word of God (hic concurrunt tres causae bonae actionis: Verbum Dei, Spiritus Sanctus et humana voluntas assentiens, nec repugnans Verbo Dei)... in such a struggle the will is not inactive.” | “The moral government of God everywhere assumes and implies the liberty of the human will, and the natural ability of men to obey God.” |
| On this map | |||
| 19 figures | 5 figures | 4 figures | 4 figures |
Who holds which view
Unable until God frees the will
Will in bondage; needs sovereign grace to be freed
Wounded, not destroyed
Nature wounded but not destroyed; grace perfects it
Unable, but grace given to all
Depraved, but prevenient grace restores ability to respond
The will is still free
Free will substantially intact; God and man cooperate
Figures who hold no stance here
These are not gaps in the table. Each group below says which kind of blank it is — searched and not found, held open on purpose, never framed in these terms, or deliberately unassigned because no stance fits.
How to read a cell — sourcing tiers, blanks, and why some figures are never quoted
A cell marked quoted carries the figure's own words — 359 of 518of them, about 69%. Where there is no quotation the claim is still sourced, and the tier says how far. 3 figures carry no quotation at all, for reasons that differ: a living author cannot be quoted at length under copyright where Calvin can, and a figure at the standard account tier has simply had no primary-source pass yet. 3 of them state their own reason on their page.
A state label ending in ° was read from the stance, tier and note rather than stated on the map. See themethodology.